The same AI pass that codes the chart reviews its documentation against the clinical evidence. The gaps worth a specialist's time become prioritised CDI opportunities, a neutral query is drafted from the evidence, and the physician's answer flows back into the coding - with a coder checking every change.
Each agent sees only what its task needs, and a CDI specialist stands between every step.
Reads the de-identified chart while it is coded and sorts every documentation finding into four categories, each with verbatim excerpts located in the document.
Drafts a neutral, non-leading clarification from the smallest context - the opportunity and its excerpts, never the whole chart - for the specialist to edit and send.
Reads the physician's answer once and says whether it changes the coding. Deterministic safety rules then decide what may change, and a coder reviews it.
Six steps from the doctor's words to a coded, audited and grouped chart, with people reviewing the results along the way.
Dictate or record the consultation with consent; the doctor approves the draft.
Exports PDF, JSON or FHIR R4Scans become text, and identifiers are masked before any AI sees them.
Suggested codes arrive with the passage behind them, for the coder to accept.
A second AI pass scores the coding and proposes changes for the auditor.
Documentation gaps become neutral, non-leading physician queries.
A rules-based grouper assigns the DRG, final when the chart is locked.
From the first finding to the reconciled code, every step is recorded and every change is a person's decision.
Every finding lands in one of four categories - well supported, needs clarification, conflicting, possibly missing - with how it is documented now, what a clarification would settle, and the excerpts that put it there. View evidence highlights them in the document.
Findings that deserve attention become prioritised opportunities - high, medium or low - with the clinical indicators, what is documented now and the gap between them.
A draft written from the opportunity and its excerpts alone - neutral and non-leading by construction. The specialist edits it, regenerates it or saves it.
The query is sent to the chart's doctor or another doctor as an exact snapshot that can no longer be edited. The physician opens a link with no login, sees what was sent and its evidence, picks an option or writes a comment, and answers once.
The reconciliation agent is asked once whether the answer changes the coding. Then deterministic rules take over:
The CDI workspace sits beside the document, and every query carries its own timeline - who drafted it, when it was sent and viewed, what the physician said and what changed as a result.
Illustration - a fictional chart.
When DRG grouping needs a clinical detail the documentation leaves unclear, the DRG tab offers Clarify through CDI. It links an existing opportunity or opens a new one - and the query never mentions the DRG, a weight or reimbursement.
Every coded inpatient chart grouped into its DRG by a rules-based grouper, reviewed by your DRG specialist and made final when the chart is locked.
Explore DRG GroupingA demo account opens the whole platform - upload a chart, review the documentation findings, and draft your first physician query from the evidence.
Start a Free Demo Talk to us first